NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 3 Educational Technology Comparison If you need assistance with “NURS FPX 6109 Assessment 3: Educational Technology Comparison,” Comparison of Features, Benefits, and Capabilities

Technology Descriptions

Undergraduate nursing programs frequently employ low-fidelity simulations (LFS) and high-fidelity simulations (HFS) to adequately prepare nursing students for practical applications and nurse placements. According to research, giving students the chance to hone their skills in extremely realistic environments may help them perform better during clinical placements, reduce practice-related anxiety, and enhance learning outcomes. Low-fidelity simulations are helpful for training basic skills, including communication, basic medical assessments, and routine operations.

They usually use simple models or mannequins. Conversely, high-fidelity simulations employ cutting-edge technology to mimic actual patient situations, providing engaging experiences that test one’s ability to think critically, make decisions, and collaborate with others. Both approaches give students worthwhile, practical learning experiences that boost their self-esteem and proficiency (Vlachogianni & Tselios, 2021).

Social Benefits of Technology

Anthropomorphic dolls that faithfully mimic physiological reactions similar to those observed in living things are known as hyper-realistic figurative simulacra (HFSs). In medical teaching, sophisticated methodologies make it easier to replicate real-world situations, allowing students to improve and hone their clinical skills while reducing the risk of patient injury. Following a nursing course, enhanced skill performance has been linked to the use of high-fidelity manikins (HFMs) for advanced life support training.

Nursing students can hone their clinical skills in a secure setting with these simulators’ realistic features, which include heartbeats, breathing patterns, and even reactions to drugs or therapies. Research has demonstrated that these simulations improve critical thinking, decision-making, and teamwork under duress in addition to technical skills (Jiang et al., 2021).

It is admirable to use low-fidelity simulators (LFS) to investigate critical thinking processes and develop decision algorithms. The simulations that are frequently utilised in educational contexts are usually characterized by their static nature and limited options for student participation, which leads learners to see LFSs as the least realistic. Usually, computer-based or paper-based platforms are used for these simulations. Examples of low-fidelity manikins fall into two groups: those that can provide feedback and those that cannot. The purpose of this review is to assess high-fidelity and low-fidelity manikins, two distinct simulation-based technologies (Shahzad et al., 2020).

Canvas’s user interface is modern, straightforward, and easy to use, even for those without much technical experience. Blackboard, on the other hand, has a more complicated user interface and is more capable, but it also has a higher learning curve for new users. Canvas is excellent at customisation, giving teachers a wide range of choices to modify course layouts to suit individual preferences or organizational requirements. Although Blackboard is less complete and adaptable than Canvas, it still permits customisation.

Furthermore, Canvas seamlessly supports multimedia content, interactive assignments, and exams by integrating with a large number of third-party tools and apps. Even while Blackboard allows third-party integrations, it frequently necessitates extra technical assistance and configuration. The cloud-based infrastructure of Canvas improves accessibility by allowing users to engage with the platform from any internet-connected device (Kateřina Berková et al., 2023).

Capabilities of Technology in the Modern Era

A smooth experience across devices is guaranteed by Canvas, a well-designed mobile application that mirrors a large portion of the online platform’s capabilities. Students and teachers can check grades, turn in assignments, take part in conversations, and even see course materials while on the go with the help of the mobile app. In contrast to its web interface or the Canvas mobile app, Blackboard’s mobile app is functional but has less functionality. Although it lacks some of the more sophisticated capabilities included in the PC version, it offers basic access to grades, assignments, and course materials.

With a wide range of options that improve functionality and create a customized learning environment, Canvas shines when it comes to third-party application integration. Examples include smooth connections with Google Drive, Office 365, and other educational tools (Parekh, 2024).

For both students and teachers, using learning platforms is essential, and both Canvas and Blackboard have tools that encourage communication and monitor progress. Canvas has a very user-frien